56.1k views
2 votes
Let's start with an example from history. Listed below are a series of claims regarding United States President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963). Classify each statement according to whether or not it is falsifiable.

User Gen
by
4.3k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Final answer:

John F. Kennedy's foreign affairs experience was initially scrutinized due to his youth and perceived inexperience. However, his adept handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and leadership in Berlin demonstrate his effectiveness in foreign policy, turning initial criticisms into acknowledgments of his proficient crisis management and diplomatic skills.

Step-by-step explanation:

President John F. Kennedy's Foreign Affairs Experience:

Assessing the claims about President John F. Kennedy's experience in foreign affairs and the public's perception during his presidency requires a look at historical actions and public reactions of the time. Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and his dealings with leaders from Cuba, the U.S.S.R., and Germany provided concrete examples of his capabilities in international relations. While some critics argued he was too inexperienced, others believed he proved his competence through the successful resolution of these incidents. The evidence for his adequacy as president in foreign affairs comes from the avoidance of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis and the assertive stance in Berlin, which garnered public approval and international respect.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy showed a balanced approach, combining diplomatic negotiations with military readiness. This crisis was a turning point that helped to shape his image as a capable leader in foreign policy, despite his relatively young age and initial criticisms of inexperience. Moreover, his speeches in Berlin and his domestic endorsement of civil rights further solidified his reputation for leadership.

User Jack Kelly
by
4.0k points
2 votes

Answer:

Note that both of the falsifiable claims in this example happen to be true. The claim about Kennedy being the 35th President is falsifiable because it can be checked against historical records. The claim that Kennedy died from a bullet in his brain is falsifiable because it could have been shown false by the medical examiner. The remaining claims are not falsifiable: Statements that call on any type of supernatural being are by definition out of the realm of science. Similarly, a claim of something being "undetectable" could not be falsified, and a claim about what Kennedy would have done if he had lived is a conjecture that cannot be disproven.

Step-by-step explanation:

User ChrisSwires
by
3.5k points