399 views
5 votes
A newspaper reported the results of a survey on the planning habits of men and women. In response to the question​ "What is your preferred method of planning and keeping track of​ meetings, appointments, and​ deadlines?" 54​% of the men and 44​% of the women answered​ "I keep them in my​ head." A nationally representative sample of​ 1,000 adults participated in the​ survey; therefore, assume that 500 were men and 500 were women. Complete parts 1 through 5.1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses for testing whether the percentage of men who prefer keeping track of appointments in their head, p_1, is larger than the corresponding percentage of women, p_2. Choose the correct answer below. a. H_0: p_1 - p_2 = 0 versus H_a: p_1 - p_2 < 0 b. H_0: p_1 - p_2 = 0 versus H_a: p_1 - p_2 ≠ 0 c. H_0: p_1 - p_2 = 0 versus H_1: p_1 - p_2 > 02. Compute the test statistic for the test.3. Give the rejection region for the test, using α = 0.104. Find the p-value for the test.5. Make an appropriate conclusion. Choose the correct answer below. a. Since the p-value is greater than the given value of alpha, there is sufficient evidence to reject H_0. b. Since the p-value is less than the given value of alpha, there is sufficient evidence to reject H_0. c. Since the p-value is less than the given value of alpha, there is insufficient evidence to reject H_0. d. Since the p-value is greater than the given value of alpha, there is insufficient evidence to reject H_0.

User Psliwa
by
5.4k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

1)


H_0: p_1-p_2=0\\\\H_a: p_1-p_2>0

2) z=3.164

3) Critic value z₀=1.282.

4) P=0.00078

5) The correct answer is: "Since the p-value is less than the given value of alpha, there is sufficient evidence to reject H_0"

Explanation:

5.1) Being:

p₁: proportion of men who keep track of the deadlines in their head

p₂: proportion of women who keep track of the deadlines in their head

If we want to test if p₁ is larger than p₂, the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis should be:


H_0: p_1-p_2=0\\\\H_a: p_1-p_2>0

In this way, if we reject the null hypothesis, it can be claimed that p₁ is larger than p₂.

5.2) Compute the test statistic for the test.

First, we have to estimate a proportion as if the null hypothesis is true. This means the average of proportion of the samples taken from men and women, weighted by the sample size.


\bar p=(n_1p_1+n_2p_2)/(n_1+n_2)=(500*0.54+500*0.44)/(500+500)= 0.49

Then, we used this average to estimate the standard error


s=\sqrt{(p(1-p))/(n_1)+{(p(1-p))/(n_2)}}=\sqrt{(0.49(1-0.49))/(500)+{(0.49(1-0.49))/(500)}}=√(0.0004998+0.0004998)\\\\s= 0.0316

Lastly, we calculate the statistic z


z=(p_1-p_2)/(s)=(0.54-0.44)/(0.0316)=(0.10)/(0.0316)=3.164

5.3) Give the rejection region for the test, using α = 0.10

For a one-tailed test with α = 0.10, the z value to limit the rejection region is z=1.282.

For every statistic larger than 1.282, the null hypothesis should be rejected.

5.4) Find the p-value for the test.

The p-value for a z=3.164 is P=0.00078 (corresponding to the area ot the standard normal distribution for a z larger than 3.164).

5.5) Choose the correct answer below.

The correct answer is: "Since the p-value is less than the given value of alpha, there is sufficient evidence to reject H_0"

The difference between the proportions is big enough to be statistically significant and enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

User Erik Forbes
by
5.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.