187k views
1 vote
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) makes it illegal for US citizens to bribe high ranking foreign officials to get new business. A violation can have a criminal penalty that involves up to five years in prison. If Phil were to be found to be in violation of the FCPA, what standard of proof would be needed for a criminal conviction?

A) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
B) Clear and convincing evidence.
C) Proof beyond all doubt.
D) Pre-ponderance of the evidence.

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer: a. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt

Step-by-step explanation:

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a proof that is close to certainty. Once there's an evidence for a case, that's enough.

User Shalev Shalit
by
5.6k points