Answer:
Language designed by committee is not a good idea.
Language should not be designed by committee, but it can be ruled and regulated by committee. So that non speakers of such language can study the language.
Explanation: selecting committee to design a language will always result to a compromise between the requirements and the viewpoints of the participants. When committees are to design a language and give it a rule, they will always be poor technical knowledge, which includes needless complexity, internal inconsistency, logical flaws and lack of unifying vision by the participants of such language.
But in setting a rule that regulate a language by a committee is accepted, so that non speakers of such language can also study the language.
People tends to learn new things to add into an existing language more easier, and faster, which makes language more interesting and comfortable by the owners of the language, but when a set of people are the only ones to bring in new things to the language, it makes the language boring to the speakers, any set committee to a language should only accept what, their noticed is now becoming a generally spoken terms for the language owners, as part of the language. And not to conclude and bring in a statement of their own to add to a language.
Language is what we learn basically as a child, so setting a committee to design a language means that all new born child should go and stay with the committee so as to learn the language been designed by the committee. Which is not practically possible.
Step-by-step explanation: