174k views
4 votes
E-trex, Inc. wanted Prince, a professional basketball player, to endorse its products. Prince, however, was not interested. E-trex was not deterred and hired a person who looked and sounded liked Prince for its commercials.

a.E-trex has defamed Prince.
b.E-trex has interfered with a contract.
c.E-trex has interfered with a prospective advantage.
d.E-trex's conduct raises the issue of commercial exploitation.

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

E-trex, Inc.'s conduct raises the issue of commercial exploitation by hiring an impersonator who resembled Prince for its commercials.

Step-by-step explanation:

E-trex, Inc.'s conduct raises the issue of commercial exploitation. By hiring an impersonator who resembled Prince for its commercials, E-trex attempted to deceive consumers into thinking that Prince was endorsing their products. This is an example of using a well-known person's image and reputation to promote a brand without their consent.

User Ralf Edmund
by
8.1k points
4 votes

Answer:

d.E-trex's conduct raises the issue of commercial exploitation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Commercial exploitation are the activities that provide benefit to the property of the owner. Since E-trex Inc. hired a person who looked and sounded like Prince so that they can get benefit from the commercials, they raised the issue of commercial exploitation.

User Cadoo
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.