Question

Suppose that Sam, an economist from a research institute in Texas, and Teresa, an economist from a public television program, are arguing over health insurance. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate:Teresa: A popular topic for debate among politicians as well as economists is the idea of providing government assistance for health benefits.Sam: I think it is oppressive for the government to tax people who take care of themselves in order to pay for health insurance for those who are obese.Teresa: I disagree. I think government funding of health insurance is useful to ensure basic fairness.The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to:a.differences in valuesb.differences in perception versus realityc.differences in scientific judgments

Answer 1

The disagreement between economists Sam and Teresa regarding government assistance for health benefits is due to differences in values. Sam prefers minimal government intervention, whereas Teresa supports government-funded health insurance to ensure fairness. This debate is reflective of broader political ideologies and philosophical differences around health policy in the United States.

Step-by-step explanation:

The disagreement between economists Sam and Teresa over government assistance for health benefits most likely stems from differences in values. Sam, leaning towards a libertarian viewpoint, believes in minimal government intervention, suggesting that individuals should be responsible for their own health insurance, particularly when their health is within their control. In contrast, Teresa supports the notion of fairness facilitated by government-funded health insurance, which can ensure that all individuals, regardless of their health status or financial situation, have access to healthcare.

Health policy in the United States is a highly complex and contentious issue, characterized by varying opinions on the extent to which the government should intervene in healthcare markets. In recent years, this debate has been highlighted by discussions around the Affordable Care Act, which seeks to improve access to health insurance through government-supported 'exchanges'.

Overall, the debate touches upon fundamental philosophical differences regarding public policy, mandatory spending on programs like Medicaid and Medicare, and whether healthcare should be considered a basic human right. Each stance is influenced by broader political ideologies and perceptions of the role of government in contributing to the general welfare of its citizens.

Answer 2

The correct answer is letter "B": differences in perception versus reality.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the discussion, it is clear to see that Sam believes it is unfair to tax "responsible" people so others can benefit from the money collected. Whereas Teresa believes that providing part of those funds to promote health care programs is fair. The different points of view reflect a difference in perception over reality mostly in Sam's cases since not only "responsible" people are taxed. Everybody with revenue is. Even people who eventually benefit from social programs pay taxes too.