Answer:
a) 230 Km b) 76.7 km/h c) Please see below
Step-by-step explanation:
a) If we can neglect the time while the driver accelerated, the movement can be divided in two parts, each of them at a constant speed:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f271e/f271e732d29ef2f00a2d4e00623774a6248da167" alt="x = x1 + x2 \\\\x1 = 50 km/h* 1hr = 50 km, \\x2 = 90 Km/h*2hr = 180 km\\"
â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc22/4dc2295a8d15f6c9a9b80a19d9ed692c6695bb9f" alt="x = 50 km + 180 km = 230 km"
b) The average x component of velocity, can be calculated applying the definition of average velocity, as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d11d6/d11d63663222f4c382352bca90446f5c441cb89f" alt="vavg,x = (xf-xo)/(t-to)"
If we choose tâ = 0 and xâ = 0, replacing xf and t by the values we have already found, we can find vavg,x as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/197b1/197b1f944064d42e0953079c29c85c2bb8921acc" alt="vavg,x =(230 km)/(3 hr) =76.7 km/h"
c) The found value of avg,x is not the same as the arithmetic average of the initial and final values of vx (70 Km/h) due to the time traveled at both velocities was not the same.
If the driver had droven half of the time (1.5 h) at 50 km/h and the other half at 90 km/h, total displacement would have been as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cef6/9cef634e4ee09d607a03f62a66a5f1b1160061ed" alt="x = 50 km/h*1.5 h + 90 km/h*1.5 hr = 210 km"
Applying the definition of average velocity once more:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d18/10d18728d84187415243801bac94a20c1eee4b3c" alt="vavg,x =(210 km)/(3 hr) =70 km/h"
which is the same as the arithmetic average of the initial and final values of vâ.