Question

Object Oriented Programming (OOP) allows us to handle complex code in an organized structure and break down the problem by modelling it in a way that relates to our everyday life. With fast advancement in technology and ever decreasing product cycles, many developers are starting to believe that OOP is not currently being implemented as it was intended to be implemented. They believe that OOP is unnecessarily complicating the problem solving so, OOP should be phased out as the absence of structure is better (in many cases) than having bad structure.

Analyze the above statement very carefully and answer the following:

• Do you believe that OOP should be phased out and we should start working on some alternative(s)? Provide your answer with Yes or No.

Answer 1

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Programming languages like Python, which supports multiple Paradigms are the order of the day certainly. The world has become complex, and sometimes we need to use the FP, and Sometimes POP or the procedural oriented programming language, and sometimes we need to use the Object-Oriented Programming language. Hence, a modern programming language should support all Paradigm. It should not just support FP like HASKEL, and it should support all the Python. And you can find that HASKEL is on the decline, and so is R. However, Python is now even more popular than Java and JavaScript. And this proves our ideology.