Question

M.K. Manufacturers, a toy manufacturing firm, manufactured and sold a range of toys that used metallic paint, which is proven to be harmful to children. However, there is insufficient proof of negligence against the firm. In this scenario, a group of parents who want to sue M.K. Manufacturers for damages are most likely to claim:

Answer 1

Answer: They will want to make their claim that the company should have carried out research and have enough information about the paint.

Step-by-step explanation:

These group of parents will mostly likely clam that the company didn't exercise enough time to do research on the paint and how harmful it could be to children.

Their parents would want to make the court believe that it is the obligation of the company to have carried out research before producing such toy with the paint , although there insufficient evidence which shows the tendency that the parent with lose the case but they will want to make their point on the research which the company should have made and probably show up their own evidence about the paint against the company