202k views
2 votes
The combination of dominant tree species in Eastern forests will likely change in the future. Some forest types, including spruce/fir and maple/beech/birch, may shrink significantly or disappear altogether, depending on how greatly carbon dioxide emissions increase in the future. How would you adapt your behavior to create a different scenario, one in which the was no substantial change in the tree species over time? Select the tactic that would be of NO help.

A) Increase your demand for green products and services to reduce your carbon footprint.
B) Consider alternate energy resources that are not carbon-based: solar or wind energy.
C) Eat locally-produced and organic food; cur meat and dairy consumption.
D) Manage lands for restoration and watershed conservation.

The combination of dominant tree species in Eastern forests will likely change in-example-1
User Vincent K
by
4.4k points

2 Answers

1 vote

The substantial change in the tree species over time A) Increase your demand for green products and services to reduce your carbon footprint. Therefore , A) Increase your demand for green products and services to reduce your carbon footprint is correct .

The relationship between the increasing demand for green products and the potential consequence of cutting down trees presents a complex environmental challenge.

While green products aim to reduce environmental impact, the production process and raw material extraction may counterintuitively contribute to deforestation, leading to a higher concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Trees play a crucial role in sequestering carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, a process that helps mitigate climate change by converting CO2 into oxygen.

Therefore, cutting down trees to meet the demand for resources may exacerbate the issue of rising carbon dioxide levels.

It's essential to carefully consider the sustainability of sourcing practices for green products to avoid inadvertently contributing to deforestation.

Furthermore, the claim that using green products does not reduce our carbon footprint needs clarification.

While it's true that some green products may still have associated carbon emissions in their production, transportation, and disposal, the overall environmental impact is often lower compared to conventional alternatives.

Adopting a comprehensive approach that includes sustainable sourcing, production, and disposal practices can contribute to a more significant reduction in carbon footprint, even if it may not eliminate it entirely.

Addressing the growing demand for green products requires a holistic and sustainable approach that considers the environmental impact throughout the product's life cycle.

Balancing this demand with the preservation of trees and mindful resource management is essential for mitigating the adverse effects on atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

User Vladimir Berezkin
by
5.3k points
4 votes

Answer:

The tactic which will be of no help will be A) Increase your demand for green products and services to reduce your carbon footprint.

Step-by-step explanation:

Increasing demand for green products will require the cutting down of trees for meeting up the needs. Hence, lesser the trees, more will be the carbon dioxide as trees tend to take up carbon dioxide and use it in the process of photosynthesis.

Also, by using green products, our carbon footprint will not be reduced because the amount of carbon dioxide we release will remain the same. Hence, option A is the correct option.

User Mukesh Tiwari
by
4.6k points