Question

Why can the argument be made that the Warren Court was one that followed a philosophy of "judicial activism"?

A) Their rulings focused on the rights of the accused and of minorities.
B) Their rulings significantly expanded the rights of those previously denied them.
C) Their decisions tended to uphold the power of state governments of the national government.
D) Their decisions failed to bring about the social change that was demanded by many in the 1960s.

Answer 1

The answer is ACTUALLY B

Step-by-step explanation:

The decisions handed down by the Warren Court rulings significantly expanded the rights of those previously denied them. True, these tended to involve minority rights and the rights of the accused, but hearing those cases did not make them an "activist" court: ruling to guarantee rights to those who should have had them originally did.

Answer 2

it's c it's about there decision and about the government so it's c