170k views
1 vote
I do not regard as empty rhetoric the claim that women’s battles are for all of us""

User We
by
6.4k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

The question addresses the broad societal implications of women's battles and rights, reflecting on the historical and modern perspectives that affirm gender equality as beneficial for all.

Step-by-step explanation:

The assertion that women’s battles are important for everyone, not just women, touches upon the concept that gender equality and feminism have broad implications that affect whole societies. The various quotations provided illustrate different perspectives on the roles and rights of women throughout history. It's clear from the given context that the progress in women's rights not only benefits women but has the potential to create a more fair and balanced society for all genders. These texts also echo the sentiment that the disenfranchisement of women is an outdated relic that should be displaced in modern times. Emphasizing diverse approaches, from analytical reasoning to emotional appeals, each text contributes to the ongoing dialogue on the necessity of recognizing and augmenting women's roles in society.

User Hozefa
by
6.6k points
6 votes

Answer:

The sentence "I do not regard as empty rhetoric the claim that women’s battles are for all of us" can be said to be an example of understatement.

Explanation:

  • The statement given above is uttered by Gould through which he means that the battles fought by women are not merely limited to the issues of women but also to the issues of blacks and poor.
  • He adds that to build an ideal society, what the white men should learn is respecting the women.
User Brian Coleman
by
6.7k points