Answer:
1. A translation of function f is
. It is equivalent to a vertical stretch or vertical compression of function f.
Let's take the function:

If we used the rules of powers, we know that when we have a subtraction in the power of an exponential, it can be split into a division. So the function can be rewritten as:

Remember the original function was:

therefore:

this means that if
then it will be a vertical stretch.
If
then it will be a vertical stretch.
2. The inverse of
is not equivalent to a translation of g.
This is partially true and you'll see why. Let's start by finding the inverse of that function:

we start by turning the given power to a multiplication of powers so we get:

we then move the
to the other side of the equation so we get:

and turn the equation into a logarithm:

so:

or:

remember that when you multiply a constant by x, you will get a horizontal compression if
and a horizontal stretch if
.
but there is another interpretation for this function. Let's take the original equation:

if we directly turned this equation into a logarithm we would get that:

so:

or:

if the inverse function is written like this, it can be interpreted as a vertical shift. Both interpretations are correct.
3. The inverse of
is not equivalent to a vertical stretch or vertical compression of g.
As we saw in the previous part of the problem, that function is either a horizontal stretch/compression or a vertical shift, not a vertical stretch or compression.
4. The function
is a vertical stretch or compression of g or of its reflection -g.
We can rewrite the function like this thanks to log rules:

which is the same as:

If
it will be a vertical compression of g(x). If
, then it will be a vertical stretch no matter if g is positive or negative.