9.5k views
5 votes
Although the term "trust" came to be a general term for any big business, there were legal differences between a formal "trust" and a "holding company." Explain the differences. What were the advantages of the latter?

1 Answer

0 votes

Step-by-step explanation:

Trust became a concept for any significant economic combination. Yet in fact, the faith was a different kind of organisation. Under the trust contract, owners in individual businesses converted their stocks to a small number of fiduciaries in return for stocks in the trust on its own.

Proprietors of trust certificates sometimes have no effective control over decision-making of fiduciaries but treasurers could only get a few companies because it would have direct control over several. A new category of takeover has arisen, which has modified its legislation to allow corporations to acquire other businesses. The trust and subsequent acquisition of firms were too much permitted.

1% of US firms could dominate 33% of revenue by the end of the 19th century. An economy structure emerged and provided very few people with huge control. A structure of organisation has been developed.

User PhazingAzrael
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.