Final answer:
To find a logical fallacy in paragraph 13 of "Better Than Words: Say it with a selfie," we must look for flaws in the writer's arguments, such as hasty generalizations or circular reasoning. These fallacies can mislead readers and are crucial to identify to ensure that arguments presented are logically consistent.
Step-by-step explanation:
To analyze paragraph 13 in the article "Better Than Words: Say it with a selfie" for an example of a logical fallacy, we have to identify parts where the writer's logic is flawed. Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning and can be spotted when conclusions do not logically follow from their premises or when there is insufficient evidence to support a stated claim. Two common types of logical fallacies are hasty generalizations and circular arguments.
An example of a hasty generalization could be if the writer concludes that since a few people interpret selfies as a superior form of communication, then everyone must feel that way. A circular argument would occur if the writer simply restates the claim as evidence, for example, saying that selfies are better than words because they convey more than language can, without offering additional supporting evidence.
It's essential for writers and readers to be aware of these fallacies to ensure that the arguments they make or evaluate are logically sound. Informal fallacies may include ad hominem attacks, where a person is discredited instead of their argument, or a bandwagon appeal, suggesting that one should follow along since everyone else is. Recognizing these fallacies helps in critically assessing the validity of an argument.