Question

Malcolm is a professional writer. He has already published many best-sellers. One of his friends expressed interest in knowing more about his writing process, so Malcolm showed his friend a few of his first drafts. The friend observed that the drafts were nothing like the final book, and the writing seemed amateurish compared to Malcolm's published work. When asked about it, Malcolm said that it was the normal way of things. In this scenario, which of the following is a likely reason for this?​A) ​Malcolm would have revised his work many times before he was satisfied with it.B) ​The publishing company would have changed Malcolm's books entirely before publishing them.C) ​The drafts were long and cohesive because Malcolm would have spent time making sure the first draft was perfect.D) ​Writers only create first drafts; other people produce all subsequent drafts.

Answer 1

The reason Malcolm's first drafts were different from his published books is because he extensively revised his work multiple times, involving a recursive writing process involving rethinking, rewriting, and incorporating peer feedback to reach the best final product.

Step-by-step explanation:

The likely reason that Malcolm's first drafts seemed amateurish compared to his published work is A) Malcolm would have revised his work many times before he was satisfied with it. Writing is a recursive and often messy process. Writers typically go through multiple drafts, revising and refining their work, and they often engage in a writing process that involves thinking and rethinking, writing and rewriting, and incorporating feedback from peers or mentors. This shows that even professional writers like Malcolm do not achieve their best work in the first try; instead, they develop a writing project through multiple drafts, continually improving upon each one until they reach the final, polished piece.

Additionally, accomplished writers understand the importance of peer review and are willing to accept advice, while also making personal judgements on which suggestions to incorporate. Not every piece of feedback will necessarily be used, but it is still a valuable part of the revision process. The writer's willingness to engage in this process shows a commitment to honing their craft and producing high-quality writing.

Answer 2

Malcolm is a professional writer. He has already published many best-sellers. One of his friends expressed interest in knowing more about his writing process, so Malcolm showed his friend a few of his first drafts. The friend observed that the drafts were nothing like the final book, and the writing seemed amateurish compared to Malcolm's published work. When asked about it, Malcolm said that it was the normal way of things. In this scenario, the following is the reason of this:

A) ​Malcolm would have revised his work many times before he was satisfied with it.

Step-by-step explanation:

• The option A is best reason because generally a writer doesn't break his or her flow while writing and that is what Malcolm would have done. After, he would have revised his work many times until he was satisfied.
• The option B is not correct as it is not possible to change the book of a writer entirely by the publishing company.
• The option C is also incorrect as the drafts were not long and cohesive because his friend found the draft amateurish but not perfect.
• The option D is incorrect as it is not true that writers only create first draft and other people produce all other subsequent drafts.