Register
Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise activism or restraint, and tell how Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education were examples of each.
217k views
11 votes
Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise

activism or restraint, and tell how Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education were
examples of each.

User MrAlek
by
5.0k points

1 Answer

10 votes

Answer:

Judicial restraint

Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities; it is the opposite of judicial activism. Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis; a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; and a tendency to deliver narrowly tailored verdicts, avoiding "unnecessary resolution of broad questions."

Step-by-step explanation:

User Adam Jachocki
by
5.3k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

4.7m questions

6.1m answers

Other Questions

Is there a correlation between the size of an empire and the amount of power it holds in the world?
Thomas Edison Is considered one of the greatest investors because he was responsible for
Which of the following was a cause of the French and Indian War? A Arguments about the prices Indians were paid for the furs they trapped for the British B Disagreements between the French and British
President dwight eisenhower said, "even if [vice president] nixon and i were not good friends, i would still have him in every important conference of government, so that if the grim reaper [death] would
What is some nigerian history
Link Copied!