Answer:
a) For this case we have the linear model given:
![P(t) = 223.89 e^(0.1979t)](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/6mfa9mm2y0ahhfeqnnav9vz4r1p77jxr22.png)
And we want to see the fit to the model so we can calculate the value for the model and the difference respect to the observed value.
![t=0, P(0)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*0)= 223.89 , e= |216.8-223.89|=7.09](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/rwyu65nguvkudx0q7hpixpa3lwd7bz9z0r.png)
![t=1, P(1)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*1)= 272.89 , e= |256.6-272.89|=16.29](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/cb2iwv04xndwx4tuhodi7at400mxa16b7t.png)
![t=2, P(2)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*2)=332.60 , e= |361.6-332.60|=29.00](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/j88rgdrk4215g71bboghxgee5tru83yy1y.png)
![t=3, P(3)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*3)= 405.39 , e= |425.8-405.39|=20.41](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/k259gkwxtbplf8y2k4d2khr497id26y7i6.png)
![t=4, P(4)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*4)= 494.11 , e= |481.6-494.11|=12.51](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/wspyrdn7o9pxo3l4gdwr2daujjgn3124ek.png)
As we can see the model not perfect fits to the data but the residuals are not to higher compared to the real values.
b)
c)
![t=15, P(15)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*15)= 4357.505](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/s4uevgec9wy6frjf2klwrpjqziklv2no5y.png)
As we can see the difference between the two models is higher.
Explanation:
For this case we have the following data:
x=t y=P(t)
0 216.8
1 256.6
2 361.6
3 425.8
4 481.6
5 602.0
6 729.8
7 912.0
8 1102.9
9 1280.3
Where x represent the year, with t = 0 corresponding to 2000
Part a
For this case we have the linear model given:
![P(t) = 223.89 e^(0.1979t)](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/6mfa9mm2y0ahhfeqnnav9vz4r1p77jxr22.png)
And we want to see the fit to the model so we can calculate the value for the model and the difference respect to the observed value.
![t=0, P(0)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*0)= 223.89 , e= |216.8-223.89|=7.09](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/rwyu65nguvkudx0q7hpixpa3lwd7bz9z0r.png)
![t=1, P(1)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*1)= 272.89 , e= |256.6-272.89|=16.29](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/cb2iwv04xndwx4tuhodi7at400mxa16b7t.png)
![t=2, P(2)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*2)=332.60 , e= |361.6-332.60|=29.00](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/j88rgdrk4215g71bboghxgee5tru83yy1y.png)
![t=3, P(3)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*3)= 405.39 , e= |425.8-405.39|=20.41](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/k259gkwxtbplf8y2k4d2khr497id26y7i6.png)
![t=4, P(4)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*4)= 494.11 , e= |481.6-494.11|=12.51](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/wspyrdn7o9pxo3l4gdwr2daujjgn3124ek.png)
As we can see the model not perfect fits to the data but the residuals are not to higher compared to the real values.
Part b
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
So we can find the sums like this:
With these we can find the sums:
And the slope would be:
Nowe we can find the means for x and y like this:
And we can find the intercept using this:
So the line would be given by:
Part c
![t=15, P(15)= 223.89 e^(0.1979*15)= 4357.505](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/s4uevgec9wy6frjf2klwrpjqziklv2no5y.png)
As we can see the difference between the two models is higher.