Final answer:
True, Beardsley and Lane Beardsley argue that philosophical beliefs support many of one's ordinary beliefs, with philosophy providing a method for evaluating and refining these beliefs to align with truth and evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
True, according to Beardsley and Lane Beardsley, philosophical beliefs do indeed support many of one'’s ordinary beliefs. In the realm of philosophy, individuals engage in introspection regarding their thinking and the set of beliefs that they use to process the world. Over time, people often discover that some of their beliefs may be contradictory or not entirely accurate, underscoring the importance of philosophical inquiry.
For instance, considering the concept of truth, philosophy helps individuals understand that truth is not subjective. A statement about the world has a single truth value, regardless of individual beliefs. Philosophers argue that examining our beliefs to uncover which of them are supported by stronger evidence and reason is a valuable process. Moreover, philosophers stress that just because a true statement cannot currently be proven or disproven, this does not imply that it lacks a true or false value.
Additionally, philosophical approaches like foundationalism and conceptual analysis help to scrutinize the coherence and evidence supporting our beliefs. The interplay between logic, evidence, and conceptual analysis leads to multiple philosophical perspectives, each with trade-offs that must be evaluated to understand the veracity of our beliefs.