Final answer:
OPTION A.
Science and pseudoscience both offer explanations; however, science is grounded in evidence and testing, whereas pseudoscience often lacks empirical support and is based on beliefs rather than testable claims. Science can adapt and evolve, while pseudoscience remains static.
Step-by-step explanation:
The common trait between science and pseudoscience is that both offer an explanation. While science is based on methods that involve repeated observations, evidence, and testing, pseudoscience provides explanations that lack empirical support and are not reliably tested. Science operates through descriptive and hypothesis-based methodologies which are in continuous dialogue, using the scientific method to formulate theories and draw conclusions grounded in evidence. However, pseudoscience often relies on untestable claims and belief systems more than empirical evidence.
Both descriptive science and hypothesis-based science are fundamental in providing explanations for how the world works, but while science can be revised and refined as new evidence becomes available, pseudoscience typically does not change with time and remains rigid despite contrary evidence. An example of the scientific approach is the development of Velcro, which began with an observation of burrs and was then explored through hypothesis and experimentation.