Answer:
The possible answers for this question are:
a. Adamson v. California
b. Batson v. Kentucky
c. J.E.B. v. Alabama
d. Swain v. Alabama
The correct answer is:
a. Adamson v. California
Step-by-step explanation:
For the Supreme Court, according to the fifth Amendment, in this case Adamson, who had been convicted by the state of California for being guilty of first degree murder, had the right to omit his testimony against himself.
Basically, the fifth amendment of the constitution of the United States of America states that an individual would be protected against self-incrimination.