Answer:
1.
The company's current ratio on December 31 after the delay in the delivery of $1 million in inventory purchased on account will be 1.21; which is an increase when we compare to the current ratio of 1.19 in case the delivery of inventory is taken place before year end.
Supporting calculations:
* In case the inventory taken before year end:
Current ratio = Current asset/ Current liabilities = 12/10.1 = 1.19
* In case the inventory taken after year end:
Inventory will go down by $1 million causing Current asset to the balance of $11 million ( $12 million - $1 million).
Account Payable will go down by $1 million causing Account Payable to the balance of $9.1 million ($10.1 million - $1 million)
=> Current ratio = Current asset/ Current liabilities = 11/9.1 = 1.21
2.
The practice may be considered to be ethical or unethical depending on the actual circumstances ( which needs more information to evaluate) as well as the point of view of different persons.
However, from the given information, we may come up with some arguments for and against the practice as below:
* For the practice:
- Maximize the shareholders' value by increasing the working capital usage through optimizing the level of inventory ( do not store more inventory than it is required)
- Decreasing the liquidity risk of the company by not breach the loan government to the bank without negative effect on the normal business of the firm.
* Against the practice:
- Negative effect caused to stakeholders which are suppliers as the practice decrease the revenue which should have been recognized by the suppliers under the normal business conditions.
- Does not truly reflect what would have been happened under normal business conditions. Instead, what is reported has much been affected by the loan covenants.
Step-by-step explanation: