Question

Why was using the courts to enforce the 15th amendment not an ideal approach?

Answer 1

Using the courts to enforce the 15th Amendment was not ideal due to limited scope, state resistance, and violence/intimidation faced by African Americans.

Step-by-step explanation:

The use of courts to enforce the 15th Amendment was not an ideal approach due to several reasons:

1. Limited Scope: The courts ruled that the 15th Amendment only applied to federal elections and not state or local elections. This limited the impact of the amendment and allowed states to continue with discriminatory practices in their own elections.

2. State Resistance: State officials, who were often resistant to enforcing the 15th Amendment, continued to discriminate against African American voters despite court rulings. This made it difficult for courts to effectively enforce the amendment.

3. Violence and Intimidation: Many African Americans faced violence and intimidation from white groups like the Ku Klux Klan, which made it difficult for courts to protect their voting rights.

Answer 2

The using the courts to enforce the 15th amendment not an ideal approach because this amendment was done by the constitution which is considered as supreme authority in the country (US).

Step-by-step explanation:

The Amendment 15th was a right which was given the African American men through which they can exercise their vote in the country as a permanent citizens. This was a change in the constitution which is known as the highest authority or supreme power in the country.

Despite the amendment, by the late 1870s discriminatory practices were used to prevent blacks from exercising their right to vote, especially in the South. To give rights to the African American men, the Supreme court came.