Answer:
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
Step-by-step explanation:
The best statement which explains the above scenario is 'post hoc, ergo propter hoc'. This statement is known as an informal fallacy, according to this statement because burglaries were followed by an increase in ice-cream sales then it means that an increase in ice-cream sales is the cause of burglaries. In other words, if 'y' is followed by 'x' then 'x' must have caused 'y'.