Final answer:
Effective actions in group discussions maintain focus and collaboration, while disruptive actions hinder progress. Disturbance Theory explains how events catalyze collective action and interest group mobilization.
Step-by-step explanation:
Identifying actions as either effective or disruptive to a group discussion involves understanding how behaviors impact the collective dynamics and progress towards achieving group goals. Ignoring typos and irrelevant questions can be deemed effective as it helps maintain focus on the main discussion points, rather than getting sidetracked by minor mistakes. In contrast, engaging in behaviors that do not contribute to the solution, refusing to participate in decision-making, or not following agreed decisions could be seen as disruptive, as these actions may hinder group cohesion and progress.
The concept of Disturbance Theory and mobilization for action explains how significant events can spur collective behavior and lead to interest group formation or growth, as exemplified by the publication of Silent Spring and the subsequent rise in environmental activism. Similarly, political moments, such as debates on immigration policy, can act as catalysts for collective action and mobilization of interest groups.
In sum, actions that enhance collaboration, maintain focus, and facilitate progress in group discussions are effective, while those that detract from these objectives are likely to be disruptive.