Question

Which of the following is NOT a benefit of designing for producibility? [Identify the methods and objectives of manufacturing that influence system design.]

a. Little or no testing required
b. Lower overall cost
c. Quicker product introduction
d. Stable product design

Answer 1

The option 'a. Little or no testing required' is the incorrect choice because testing is critical for ensuring the safety and quality of the product, regardless of its producibility. Producing a design that is optimized for manufacturing still necessitates adequate testing at various stages.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question poses a scenario regarding the benefits of designing a product with producibility in mind. In the context of manufacturing and system design, producibility refers to the extent to which a product is designed for easy production, which typically results in lower costs, quicker market introduction, and a more stable design. The incorrect option among the provided benefits of designing for producibility is a. Little or no testing required.

Testing is a critical component of the design process and is necessary to ensure product quality and safety, and it cannot be substantially reduced or eliminated simply because producibility has been considered. Contrarily, the concepts of incremental design, detailed design processes, and an understanding of stakeholder needs all underscore the importance of rigorous testing, iterating, and refinement in order to reach high product standards and market success.

Answer 2

The correct answer is letter "A": Little or no testing required.

Step-by-step explanation:

Producibility design allows a company to have a reliable product design aligned with manufacturing processes that reduce overall costs. By doing so, the efficiency of the product becomes higher because of the trial processes the firms go through, leading to a quicker introduction of the good to customers.