206k views
4 votes
Two scientists in British Columbia are counting trout spawning grounds (called redds) along 5 km of a stream. The presence of

milky-colored fish spawn indicates a redd. The scientists walk together, surveying the same areas. What is the most likely reason
for them to count different numbers of redds?

User Kiyanna
by
4.7k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

A) Some places look as if they might or might not be redds, and different scientists identify them differently.

Two scientists in British Columbia are counting trout spawning grounds (called redds-example-1
User Adam Krawesky
by
5.0k points
3 votes

The most likely reason for the scientists to count different numbers of redd is the observer’s efficiency.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a field survey based on visual counting for visual stock assessment, the scientists may count a different number of redds each time in the same area due to the observer’s or the scientist’s efficiency.

The same place may first appear as redd and then later may not and accordingly the scientist's count also varies.

This error happens due observer’s inexperience in surveying, misidentification of redd species, changes or variations each time in the redd habitat, survey life, characteristics, spawning shifts etc., and poor temporal and spatial coverage.

User Dylan Delobel
by
5.6k points