Final answer:
During World War I, the U.S. homefront saw the suppression of dissent through the Espionage Act and the Sedition Act; Schenck v. United States was a Supreme Court case that upheld these acts. Items associated with this time are the Espionage Act, the Sedition Act, and Schenck v. United States; internment camps are not relevant as they were a World War II occurrence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The U.S. homefront during World War I was marked by efforts to mobilize the nation's citizenry in support of the war effort and suppress dissent. Important measures associated with these efforts include the Espionage Act, the Sedition Act, and the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States. The Espionage Act of 1917 criminalized various forms of interference with military operations and banned certain types of speech, while the Sedition Act of 1918 expanded these restrictions to cover a wider range of expressions deemed disloyal to the United States. The landmark Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919 upheld the constitutionality of these acts, setting the precedent for limits on free speech during wartime. Internment camps for Japanese Americans, however, are associated with World War II, not World War I.
Looking at the options provided, the correct associations with the U.S. homefront during World War I are:
- The Espionage Act (C)
- The Sedition Act (B)
- Schenck v. United States (D)
The Alien Act is not specifically mentioned, and it references legislation from a much earlier time (1798). Internment camps for Japanese Americans (E) were a feature of the homefront during World War II, not World War I.