119k views
4 votes
Why did Hamilton say that a Bill of Rights was not necessary to be added to the Constitution? A) The national and state constitutions were already a bill of rights guaranteed by the people. B) The Bill of Rights were already ample and of a precise manner within the convention. C) Great Britain had a Bill of Rights under which many were born under and had protection. D) The people had natural rights that could not be taken away by the government.

User Theva
by
5.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Answer is A, "The national and state constitutions were already a bill of rights guaranteed by the people."

User Bhavya Shaktawat
by
5.0k points