Question

In the story, Judson would have lived if he hadn't attempted to punish the thief. How fair is

it that Judson died even though he didn't technically commit a crime, while whoever stole

his whiskey gets to live with the crime?

Answer 1

It is fair because it is seeming that Judson was told not to punish the thief, but did it anyway. It was not really his place to take care of a criminal.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not quite sure if the man was told not to punish the thief or not, but if so then the answer I've given would work.