Register
Secondhand smoke can be filtered by the lungs and is therefore less harmful than firsthand smoke. Please select the best answer from the choices provided. T F.
208k views
5 votes
Secondhand smoke can be filtered by the lungs and is therefore less harmful than firsthand smoke. Please select the best answer from the choices provided. T F.

User Umut Koseali
by
4.0k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer: False

Explanation: It is just as harmful, the lungs cannot filter it.

User Anas Azeem
by
3.7k points
1 vote

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

It is just as harmful, the lungs cannot filter it.

User Kindofgreat
by
3.9k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

3.8m questions

4.9m answers

Other Questions

NO ONE CAN SOLVE THIS, NEITHER CAN YOU :::By what percent will a fraction change if its numerator is decreased by 10% and its denominator is decreased by 70%?
Aid awarded based on family income is called​
What does the principle of uniformitarianism tell us about the past? Processes at work in the past were very different than those at work today. The past has no bearing on the future or present. The past
For the function f (x) = (-6x - 2)^2 , what is f (-7)? a. -40 b. 40 c. 80 d. 1600 e. 1936
Which word(s) are associated with the illustration? A) legend B) caption C) definition D) call number
Link Copied!