195k views
4 votes
How did the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists view the Constitution differently?

A.Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while Anti-Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was needed to protect citizens.

B.Federalists believed that the Constitution should be as weak as the Articles of Confederation, while Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution needed to give the national government more power.

C.Federalists believed that the Constitution would set up another monarchy, while the Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution had checks and balances to keep it from becoming too powerful.

D.Federalists believed that state governments should maintain power over the national government, while Anti-Federalists believed that states should be weaker than the national government.

User Adrichman
by
3.2k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

Nope the answer is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Pauldx
by
3.5k points
5 votes

Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while Anti-Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was needed to protect citizens.

Step-by-step explanation:

Trust, I took the test.

How did the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists view the Constitution differently-example-1
User Aaron Liu
by
3.3k points