Final answer:
The summary should focus on the balance between corporate size and competitors and the government's regulatory role, with an emphasis on the central questions posed by the chapter. A shift to a positive academic tone involves constructive language revisions that still offer clear and actionable feedback.
Step-by-step explanation:
In an objective summary of the section "A Very Mixed Company", the most important statement to include would address the central issues the chapter explores concerning the balance between corporate size and the number of competitors within a marketplace, as well as the government's role in regulating this balance. Additionally, shifting from an academic tone requires replacing negative language with more positive connotations. For instance, instead of saying 'The information is consistently disorganized', a more positive spin would be 'The information shows room for improved organization'. Likewise, terms like 'haphazard research' could be switched to 'opportunities for more systematic research' to maintain an academic and optimistic tone.
Concerning the review question's expectation of a more positive language, one could revise the harsh critique to something more constructive. Revised sentences could read: 'The information may benefit from increased organization and a coherent plan. While the research approach can be more rigorous and comprehensive, the writer exhibits an attempt to balance narrative and reporting, though further use of anecdotes, quotations, and background would enhance the piece. The paper could improve transitions for clearer coherence.' These substitutions provide constructive feedback while maintaining a positive outlook on the writer's efforts.