Register

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in…

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in…
233k views
2 votes
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

explain your reasoning

User Butaminas
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

yeah because who's to say that we are guilty with the proof

User Michaelangelo
by
8.2k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
When an excessive amount of alcohol is consumed causing a person to stop or breath slowly, vomit in their sleep. or appear pale or bluish the person is possibly suffering from • Binge drinking Intoxication
The only person to serve two non-consecutive terms as u.S. President was known by what nickname?
When mixed with alcohol, a medication can become all of the following, except __________ . A. healthier B. useless C. unpredictable
What are necessary, just, property rights?​
Link Copied!