Register
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases,
233k views
2 votes
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

explain your reasoning

User Butaminas
by
3.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

yeah because who's to say that we are guilty with the proof

User Michaelangelo
by
3.6k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

3.4m questions

4.4m answers

Other Questions

Can my mom just email the school saying that I was sick and I don't have to get a doctor's note? ​
Which of the following is punctuation used to offset quoted material? Exclamation Marks Quotation Marks Question Marks Editor's Marks
Which is the last step in amending the u.S. Constitution?
Give me some ideas about the book artemis fowl.
What is a general partnership
Link Copied!