170k views
0 votes
Claim: To reduce crime, a curfew of 10:00 p.m. should be

in effect for all teenagers in town who are 17 or younger.
Which counter-argument to this claim most clearly uses a logical fallacy?
A. Punishing all teenagers just because a few commit crimes is
illogical
OB. The majority of crimes in town are committed by adults, not
teenagers.
C. Throwing teenagers in jail is not the solution to reducing crime.
O D. Many teenagers have jobs that require them to work after 10:00
p.m.

User Nayobi
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: its C

Explanation:

User Jfly
by
6.3k points