Question

When is a secondary source more helpful than a primary source?

A. When you are an expert in the field being studied in the experiment
B. When you want to perform the experiment yourself
C. When you want all the details of the experiment
D. When you want a quick summary of the experiment

Answer 1

I'm pretty sure the answer is D

Step-by-step explanation:

Typically with primary sources - there is a lot of detail and secondary sources generally lack some of the key details. This is why I believe D to be right because it would be just a quick summary and a few details.

I hope this helps you :)

Answer 2

D. When you want a quick summary of the experiment

Step-by-step explanation: