233k views
5 votes
GUYS PLEASE SOMEONE HELPS ITS DUE TOMORROW MORNING AND IM REALLY STUCK

(Please don’t make the answers complicated and it’s gotta be a minimum of 140 words!,)

GUYS PLEASE SOMEONE HELPS ITS DUE TOMORROW MORNING AND IM REALLY STUCK (Please don-example-1

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer: No, it wouldn’t be a work of art.

Explanation: It wouldn’t be a work of Art because the artistic value is lost since the art loses its subjectivity. When the Artist work was allowed to hang in a public space, it had boundaries and was defined by no rules. It was a beautiful fusion of art and design viewed by all. Design and Art is objective; it’s primary function is to express the imagination in non grammatical ways. Those ways are determined by the artists and those that view it.

If this piece of work belonged to a corporation, it would lose its power of reflection and instead the corporation it belonged to would be in charge of allowing the art piece to reflect or convey a new form of visual rhetoric. This new framework would allow the corporation to communicate their own message, idea, or point of view. Which no longer makes it subjective.

User MadsterMaddness
by
3.1k points