The passage's discussion of literary analysis techniques best connects to analyzing the Constitution in civics class due to the shared processes of evaluation and interpretation, as well as the challenge of meeting or resisting conventional expectations.
Choosing a connection to another text a reader could make to the passage is a matter of interpreting the thematic elements and rhetorical strategies in use. When the passage discusses summarizing, paraphrasing, explaining, analyzing, and evaluating a reading selection, it aligns most closely with the process of analyzing the Constitution in a civics class. This connection is supported by the deliberate evaluation and interpretation that both texts would require, emphasizing the importance of understanding context, structure, and purpose.
Additionally, the mention of the author's intent to meet or challenge conventional expectations aligns with the constitutional analysis, where one might explore how the document has met or defied historical and societal expectations.
Moreover, the notion of making connections and asking questions about a text links to a civics framework where students often have to compare and contrast constitutional principles with contemporary legal and social issues. Ultimately, by drawing parallels to civic education, a reader can appreciate the depth and scope of literary analysis and understand how it may reflect critical reading skills developed in other disciplines.