Answer:
System B
Step-by-step explanation:
Both projects only have costs associated with them, not sales, so we will use these to calculate the NPV of each project. Using the tax shield approach to calculate the OCF, the NPV of System A is:
OCFA = −$76,000(1 − .35) + .35($244,000 / 4)
OCFA = −$28,050.00
NPVA = −$244,000 − $28,050.00(PVIFA10%,4)
NPVA = −$332,914.73
And the NPV of System B is:
OCFB = −$70,000(1 − .35) + .35($342,000 / 6)
OCFB = −$25,550.00
NPVB = −$342,000 − $25,550.00(PVIFA10%,6)
NPVB = −$453,276.91
If the equipment will be replaced at the end of its useful life, the correct capital budgeting technique is EAC. Using the above NPVs, the EAC for each system is:
EACA = -$332,914.73 / (PVIFA10%,4)
EACA = -$105,024.88
EACB = - $453,276.91 / (PVIFA10%,6)
EACB = -$104,075.72
If the conveyor belt system will be continually replaced, we should choose System B since it has the more positive EAC.