Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Human rights constitute a concept that is similarly predicated on different
realities; or, using Wittgensteinian terms, it is a concept that intervenes in various
forms of life.52 In other words, the concept of “human rights” intervenes in different activities
human beings, which endow it with meaning. Which does not mean that it has to be put to use.
indiscriminate or equivocal in each praxis, but these praxis are linked and the
meanings given to the concept are not exclusive but complementary or, rather,
analogs.53
Indeed, among the main forms of life in which the concept "rights
human ”is the philosophical, the political and the legal-normative. They are human praxis that
They do not exclude each other but, on the contrary, their complementarity is necessary. If it's about promoting
the dignity of the person, the different “ways of life” where they participate should be considered
human rights. Human praxis in favor of these rights requires reflection
philosophical that accounts for human rights and allows their better understanding; of the
political and pedagogical actions that are carried out in the social sphere; and the instruments
legal requirements that make them operational.
It will be the object of the second chapter of this research to deepen on an understanding
complex of human rights, which assumes them as ideological moments in the processes of
liberation of the peoples; that is, that from the philosophy of liberation, rights are thought
humans, in order to reassess its liberating and emancipating dimension. However, by the
moment, and for the purposes of this chapter, we will take the definitions given by three authors.
These will give us the guideline to know what we are looking for in the praxis and discourse of the first
Defenders of Indians in the 15th century