222k views
0 votes
If you were a supreme court justice which philosophy would you utilize activism or restraint

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

I would use judicial activism.

Step-by-step explanation:

Judicial activism refers to a judge or court that is more willing to invalidate legal or governmental action. This concept is therefore broader than the strict right of review, whereby a judge checks to what extent a law, decision or measure is in accordance with a law of a higher order such as a constitution or a treaty. Therefore, as a judge, I would evaluate the constitutionality of the different laws and government actions, interpreting their legality in a broad way, and not only limiting myself to the text of the law.

User Humza Khan
by
9.1k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.