Question

Jackson, a conservative Republican, and Jessica, a liberal Democrat, both watch the same news show in separate houses. Neither are happy with the coverage of a particular story. What is the BEST explanation for how this can be?

a. framing effects
b. filtering effects
c. contrarian effects
d. the hostile media effect

Answer 1

Option d (the hostile media effect) is the correct approach.

Step-by-step explanation:

• Everything always happens when representatives of adverse party candidates, such as Republicans and Democrats, receive the news on something like a subject that is partial towards their personal views.
• This impact illustrates the concepts of the participatory public including its industry throughout showing that audience members don't absorb media material mindlessly, rather understand it deliberately throughout view about its objectives as well as behavioral patterns.

All other given alternatives aren't related to the scenario given. So the above is the correct response.

Answer 2

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

In simple words, The hostile media impact, also known as the antagonistic media hypothesis or antagonistic media interpretation, is indeed a spatial principle of information dissemination that describes how people with powerful pre - existing attitudes on issues perceive media coverage as biassed against them and in favour of their opponents' viewpoint.