Final answer:
An article about Elie Wiesel is considered a secondary source because it is created after his life events and provides analysis or context without direct evidence from eyewitnesses.
Step-by-step explanation:
The article about Elie Wiesel is considered a secondary source because it is an account created after the events of Wiesel's life occurred, and it does not come directly from Wiesel or from someone who personally witnessed the events of his life. Instead, a secondary source might analyze, critique, or summarize information from primary sources, providing valuable context and interpretation. For instance, an article that evaluates Wiesel's humanitarian work or analyzes his speeches without being an eyewitness falls under the category of secondary sources. These sources can include biographies, historical analyses, literary criticisms, and more. They are essential for setting the historical context, understanding how events relate to each other, and accessing scholarly research based on primary sources. Effective historiography requires utilizing both primary and secondary sources to develop a comprehensive understanding of past events.
Good research practices involve using secondary sources to support arguments, but not to comprise the entirety of them. Students are encouraged to present their original ideas and analyses, using secondary sources to provide evidence and authority to their work.