173,981 views
5 votes
5 votes
Select ALL the correct answers.

Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
It is the job of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution as it is written.
The Constitution should be considered a living document that changes with time.
ОООО
Changes to the constitution must come through amendments.
The Necessary and Proper Clause gives the federal government broad powers.
Reset
Next

User Nathan M
by
3.1k points

1 Answer

1 vote
1 vote

Answer:

1. The Constitution should be considered a living document that changes with time.

2. The Necessary and Proper Clause gives the federal government broad powers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering that Loose Constructionism is the judicial ideology that supports the idea that the Constitution is defined and analyzed loosely, such that it is done in a way that makes meaning to be extracted from it or flexible instead of being rigid.

Also, lose constructionism tend to support the federal government power over that other level of stakeholders such as state individuals.

Hence, in this case, the two arguments that support loose construction are:

1. The Constitution should be considered a living document that changes with time.

2. The Necessary and Proper Clause gives the federal government broad powers.

User Kohler Fryer
by
3.2k points