Answer:
The answer is "This direct variant (-4,2) is part of it".
Explanation:
The equation expresses its direct variation relation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/537a2/537a22cdd07e413a92c44007d207dc29cb0ed0dd" alt="y = mx ........ (1)"
Where x and y vary directly, and k vary continuously.
Now so the point (4,-2) is in the direct relation of variation, so from equation (1) we are given,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e61da/e61da5c246282d38f9b1ecb3cff281bb97f507c8" alt="-2 = 4m"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d002/7d002b1156209f75017d02278f5599d4390cea79" alt="\to m=-(1)/(2)"
The equation (1) is therefore converted into
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/405ec/405ec466bee5e1b0694e0b97bb3643da35b9956f" alt="\to y=-(1)/(2)x \\\\\to x + 2y = 0 ......... (2)"
Then only the point (-4,2) satisfies the connection with the four possibilities (2). Therefore (-4,2) is a direct variant of this.