Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.
Step-by-step explanation:
Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.
In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.