166k views
2 votes
PLEASE HELP

What are the missing reasons in the proof?
A. Substitution; converse of diagonals theorem
B. Sum of interior angles; converse of diagonals theorem
C. Sum of interior angles; converse of opposite angles theorem
D. Substitution; converse of opposite angles theorem

User Om Shankar
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Are these converses true? The answer is yes. Each of these converses can be a way to show that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram. However, the Consecutive Angles Converse can be a bit tricky, considering you would have to show that each angle is supplementary to its neighbor

(∠A

and

∠B, ∠B

and

∠C, ∠C

and

∠D

, and

∠A

and

∠D)

. We will not use this converse.

User CrazyEnigma
by
8.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories