Answer:
Following are the response to the given question:
Step-by-step explanation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5013f/5013fb0e07c177e4bf10ffaf130b56c049913b73" alt="White = aaBB \\\\Brown = AAbb\\\\Parental \ \ cross: aaBB * AAbb\\\\F1 \ progeny: AaBb\\\\F1 \ selfing: AaBb * AaBb\\\\F2 \ progeny:\\\\"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a325e/a325edcd1629b9c1e9efd221d19adedaae3ce05c" alt="(9)/(16) = A_(B_) = Black\\\\"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c17f/7c17fd1610621296303f3c3c7c686c69343cf053" alt="(3)/(16) = aaB_ \ = White\\\\"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c496e/c496e583ef6d4323dfb2c47adc91650ccfd253f1" alt="(3)/(16) = A_(bb) = Brown\\\\(1)/(16) = aabb = White\\\\"
The observed progeny ratios closely match the morphological ratio of 9:3:4. That's a hereditary pharmacogenetic example.
Applying a number of distinct genes = 2
You have really no connection
Phenomenon=Recessive Epistasis