Answer: No, because the damage to the windshield did not result from the abnormally dangerous aspect of the plant’s activity.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the driver will not prevail. This is because the damage to the windshield did not result from the abnormally dangerous aspect of the plant’s activity.
In this case, the owner of the plant has imposed strict safety measures to prevent an explosion at the plant and the damage of the windshield of the car was due to heavy windstorm and not from the plants activities.