Answer:
B. Loss of biodiversity as habitats are destroyed.
Step-by-step explanation:
For A, it wouldn’t make sense for the water tables to be replenished after a tsunami.
For C, fishing industries actually should have financial losses because of the tsunami, not many fish should be in the area.
For D, well tbh another earthquake shouldn’t happen, one earthquake following another yes would be catastrophic but isn’t very likely to happen. •_•
In other words, B makes the most sense and most reasonable.
Hope this helps, have a great summer! :D